Timeline for ospf range command - subordinate routes still being advertised
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2014 at 0:18 | comment | added | Ron Trunk | Ah yes, I see that now. I saw the topology diagram and jumped to conclusions. Sorry for not reading more carefully. Glad you got it working. | |
| Aug 23, 2014 at 20:43 | comment | added | psniffer | Firstly thanks for taking the time to answer, I appreciate it. I managed to get it working, I did very briefly mention the virtual links at the end of the original problem. The problem turned out to be a miss configuration of the virtual links. Thanks again. | |
| Aug 23, 2014 at 20:38 | comment | added | Ron Trunk | I would argue that virtual links makes them adjacent. But in any case, that wasn't part of the design you presented. | |
| Aug 23, 2014 at 11:49 | comment | added | psniffer | I agree its poor design and should only be used as a last resort. However it is possible to have areas that are not adjacent to area 0 with the use of virtual links. However I will try and recreate the lab with better/proper network design. | |
| Aug 23, 2014 at 11:29 | history | answered | Ron Trunk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |