Timeline for Using SNMP retrieve MAC addresses of directly connected machines to a switch
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 5, 2021 at 1:58 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | Did any answer help you? If so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you can post and accept your own answer. | |
Nov 3, 2015 at 14:07 | answer | added | Peter Green | timeline score: 0 | |
Apr 20, 2015 at 15:06 | answer | added | Stuart Smith | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 21, 2014 at 4:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackNetworkEng/status/535658591387406336 | ||
Nov 20, 2014 at 16:43 | answer | added | Eddie | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 20, 2014 at 16:35 | history | edited | Ryan Foley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Nov 20, 2014 at 13:07 | comment | added | Subhash | I am going to run this as part of my network discovery tool which finds a physical connection map between switches and hosts. This is going to run at customer's networks. Only access I can get is SNMP RO community string. Thanks for mentioning about determining uplinks way. | |
Nov 20, 2014 at 12:24 | comment | added | Mike Pennington | Please review this Q&A, the only thing lacking from that discussion is rejecting uplinks from the results. Rejecting uplinks requires us to know something about how you're managing the infrastructure... i.e. are you using LLDP on all other switches? If so, then it's not so hard to eliminate infrastructure uplinks in your results | |
Nov 20, 2014 at 12:07 | history | edited | Subhash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
Nov 20, 2014 at 8:33 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 20, 2014 at 19:44 | |||||
Nov 20, 2014 at 8:32 | history | asked | Subhash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |