Timeline for What considerations should be made when determining whether to use the BGP "network" command vs Redistribution?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2020 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackNetworkEng/status/1252613079130669057 | ||
| Apr 21, 2020 at 11:52 | answer | added | n4c | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 20:37 | vote | accept | Eddie | ||
| Feb 23, 2017 at 22:40 | answer | added | rnxrx | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 23, 2017 at 1:53 | comment | added | Eddie |
@RonTrunk if you have lots of routes, redistribute might be easier to manage -- that is a perfectly acceptable, non-trivial reason to favor redistribution over network statements. I'm sure there are others. I'm looking for reasons other than explicit control of advertised routes or origin code.
|
|
| Feb 23, 2017 at 1:15 | comment | added | Ron Trunk | The way you've phrased the question makes any answer trivial, since you've included the use of route maps. You can use a route map to change nearly every BGP route attribute. OTOH, if you have lots of routes, redistribute might be easier to manage. | |
| Feb 22, 2017 at 23:04 | comment | added | Eddie | @TeunVink Sure. I guess I mean both. Why use one command or the other to add routes to BGP on Cisco devices. | |
| Feb 22, 2017 at 22:39 | comment | added | Teun Vink | I think you're mixing the BGP protocol with BGP implementations (specifically Cisco) here. | |
| Feb 22, 2017 at 21:06 | history | asked | Eddie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |