Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 12, 2017 at 17:43 vote accept trademark
Jul 12, 2017 at 14:53 answer added trademark timeline score: 1
Jul 12, 2017 at 13:52 comment added trademark The traffic issue isn't the only factor. We are currently running out of addresses in a /22 and need to start segmenting that network anyway.
Jul 12, 2017 at 4:48 comment added vk5tu Ron's right to suggest caution. A VLAN broadcast is still a WLAN broadcast. In fact by having multiple VLANs you may have just increased the sum total of WLAN broadcasts, and thus reduced the throughput of the WLAN even further.
Jul 7, 2017 at 12:06 comment added Ron Trunk @trademark Based on your description I don't think you really mean "private VLAN" (in Cisco terms). Are you planning to prevent data going from one VLAN to another? Or are you just trying to limit broadcasts?
Jul 6, 2017 at 17:47 comment added trademark @RonTrunk We use a program that generates large amounts of broadcast traffic that doesn't need to reach beyond each cart. It's just part of our environment, so we would like to use VLANs to solve the problem. It's not simple but we would like to accomplish that level of segmentation in order to reduce unnecessary traffic across the LAN.
Jul 6, 2017 at 14:20 comment added Ron Trunk Are you sure you really need VLAN assignment by MAC? It sounds nice, but setting up RADIUS and 802.1x is not a simple thing. Maybe there are easier ways to accomplish what you really need. Do you really need private VLANs?
Jul 5, 2017 at 17:24 comment added Zac67 I guess you've pretty much nailed it: you need 802.1X authentication via RADIUS and assign the VLAN ID on the server. On the 2510 and all APs you need to configure the up/downlinks as VLAN trunks.
Jul 5, 2017 at 15:04 review First posts
Jul 5, 2017 at 17:34
Jul 5, 2017 at 15:03 history asked trademark CC BY-SA 3.0