Timeline for Does bridging add delay?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2019 at 19:02 | comment | added | kasperd | @Zac67 The length is known on some frames but not on all frames. (And after reading how that works I am sort of regretting looking it up in the first place.) | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 18:12 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | @kasperd & Marc'netztier'Luethi - Absolutely, thx. Cut-through with stepping up is impossible since you quickly run out of data (unless you now the frame length which you don't). | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 18:10 | history | edited | Zac67♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 148 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2019 at 14:29 | comment | added | Marc 'netztier' Luethi | @Kasperd Cisco, for their Nexus 3000 series, claims "cut-through" for identical speeds and speed-stepdown scenarios (40G--> 1/10G), but not for speed-stepups (1/10G -> 40g) . cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus3000/sw/… | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 14:12 | comment | added | kasperd | Worth noting that cut-through only achieves optimal performance when incoming and outgoing links run at the same bitrate. And it might be that no vendor even bothered to implement cut-through for mixed bitrate scenarios. | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 9:54 | history | answered | Zac67♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |