Timeline for Switch Renumbering
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2023 at 15:45 | answer | added | JFL | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 3, 2023 at 15:32 | comment | added | The Footsie | We have a lot of stacks, lets say 80, 79 of them go 1,2,3,4,5,6. We have one stack that goes 1,2,6,4,5,3. The network team are not the only team responsible for patching so the significance of a sign highlighting this discrepancy would be lost on them. Why train people to remember this discrepancy when I could just renumber the switches, I'm just asking if there are any issues with my plan. | |
| Feb 3, 2023 at 15:13 | answer | added | FrameHowitzer | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 3, 2023 at 14:47 | comment | added | Marc 'netztier' Luethi | .. and then there's even the mode button on many stackable ciscos, which helps to identify the switch number in the stack. | |
| Feb 3, 2023 at 13:17 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | "This is causing confusion; when an engineer physically plugs a port into switch 3 they have to remember to configure interface Gi6/0/x instead of G3/0/x." Are the labels wrong, or can the tech not read? | |
| Feb 3, 2023 at 13:08 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | I'd try stickers... | |
| Feb 3, 2023 at 12:53 | history | asked | The Footsie | CC BY-SA 4.0 |