Timeline for Why is the bandwidth of the pre-established reserved link divided on multiple new connections?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21 at 17:44 | vote | accept | tbhaxor | ||
| May 21 at 17:43 | comment | added | tbhaxor | Also the point I used related to one-fourth which is in the book, doesn't seem to imply here right? [You can answer by Q3Y or Q3N to know you commented for this] | |
| May 21 at 17:42 | comment | added | tbhaxor | Yes, I agree with you. Although this 4 links part is still not clear to me but I will skip it for now. | |
| May 21 at 17:38 | comment | added | tbhaxor | For full duplex you'd need a capacity of 64 Gbit/s shouldn't it be multiply by two? | |
| May 21 at 17:37 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | 'Links' are more or less a packet-switching concept. Each router supports four connections. ;-) | |
| May 21 at 17:32 | comment | added | tbhaxor | In context of circuit switching "If the network bandwidth isn't sufficient, no more connections can be established." this will be possible if all 4 links is engaged. Also on each router would you say there are 8 links or 4 links? | |
| May 21 at 17:31 | comment | added | tbhaxor | Ah, got it so when I used to say router has bandwidth of x, that was incorrect. Technically the bandwidth is associated with material used on link (also the algorithms in routes, but directly associated with the network link). | |
| Apr 20 at 8:45 | history | answered | Zac67♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |