5

I was pondering my network design today and came upon an idea that makes lots of sense to me, but I fear that it may be a terrible idea. I just don't have enough knowledge or experience to convince myself one way or the other.

My network consists of a core layer and an edge layer (see diagram below). Currently if I need to add a vlan, I must create it on the core, add it to the uplinks for all edge switches, create it on the edge switches, and add it to the uplinks back to the core.

The idea that came to me is to configure the edge switch ends of the uplinks to do all VLANs, but to specify allowed vlans on the core for each link. This would eliminate at least one step in the process of adding a new vlan. There are some VLANs on the core that have no need to exist on some or all of the edge switches, but there is little to no likelihood that a VLAN will ever exist on an edge switch that doesn't already exist on the core. Network Diagram

If this is a terrible idea, please explain why. If it is a decent idea, again please explain why. I appreciate any constructive criticism you might have to share.

  • I guess I should clarify that it is a Juniper environment so VTP is not an option/issue. – PacketWrangler Aug 15 '14 at 13:13
  • Did any answer help you? if so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you could provide and accept your own answer. – Ron Maupin Aug 8 '17 at 21:46
4

There's a big difference between "allowed" vlans and "created" vlans. Very few (read: NONE) of the switches I'm aware of can handle 4095 vlans. Entering the equiv of vlan create 1-4095 (i.e. all vlans) will result in an error. switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-4095 is not the same as having all vlans on the switch -- just that the port will not filter any vlans.

Bottom line, you still have to go to every switch in the land to create any new vlan(s) and assign them to the necessary ports. Vlan pruning is simply a means to reduce traffic to switches that have no need for it. A broadcast packet will be replicated to all corners unless the vlan is pruned.

(and the only two protocols I know of to communicate vlan configuration -- VTP (cisco), and GVRP -- are a can of snakes, I just don't do it.)

  • I know people who productivly use VTP in large +200 SW environments. They just have everything very very well documented. If proper care is taken there is no need not to use vlan propegation protocols. But it can be a personal thing, of course. I also wouldn't touch VTP. – Max Aug 15 '14 at 6:45
  • VTP mode transparent on everything. – HAL Aug 15 '14 at 13:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.