I am troubleshooting a bizarre case of packet loss. We have a cabinet of servers with a top of cabinet switch (Brocade FESX648-PREM). That switch runs BGP sessions with our transit providers.

We have one server (referred to below as the "bad server") that's experiencing 50% packet loss. The server is running Windows Server 2012 R2 and it's been running for months without issue until this morning. At this point, I suspect something might be wrong with the switch itself, so I'm turning to this community for help with additional troubleshooting rather than ServerFault or SuperUser for server-related troubleshooting.

This is what I've checked so far to rule out the cause of the packet loss on the bad server:

  1. No other servers in the cabinet are experiencing packet loss.
  2. The gateway switch and bad server can ping each other without issue.
  3. If I log into another server in the cabinet and attempt to ping the bad server, then I do get the packet loss.
  4. The routing table on the bad server is fine -- the default route points to the proper gateway, no other entries exist (except for local IPv4 assignments).
  5. Firewalls have been disabled.
  6. No VPN setup is in effect (i.e., routing table on the bad server just has the default route).
  7. CPU load and network traffic are both very low.
  8. Server has been power cycled.
  9. Speed and duplex settings are set to auto-neg and are the same on both the switch and server.
  10. Forced 100mbit full on both ends, still had the packet loss.
  11. There are no port errors (no drops, collisions, FCS etc) recorded on the switch.
  12. CPU utilization on the switch is low (http://pastebin.com/q24QSqEz).

Anyone have any ideas where I should look next? The results of #2, #3, and #11 in particular are really throwing me for a loop...

  • 2
    Can you move the bad server to another port on the switch? Does the switch show drops on the interfaces? Is the CPU utilization on the switch in a normal range?
    – Ron Trunk
    Oct 8, 2015 at 0:15
  • Thanks for weighing in. CPU utilization is low on the switch (details: pastebin.com/q24QSqEz ) and no drop events have been recorded on the switch for his port. I suppose the next step will be to drive down to the datacenter plug the server into a different port. Is it common for a single switch port to go bad like this?
    – Elliot B.
    Oct 8, 2015 at 0:19
  • No it's not common, but I'm running out of ideas ;-p
    – Ron Trunk
    Oct 8, 2015 at 0:29
  • how about ip addressing? Are them discontinuous? There is autosummary active on the router? Did you traceroute the packets?
    – feligiotti
    Oct 8, 2015 at 9:22

1 Answer 1


This ended up being a failing switch. A couple days later we started having issues on ports 37-48. The FESX648-PREM is powered by port ASICs which control port regions. Those regions are: 1-12, 13-24, 25-36 and 37-48. One of the failure modes on this box is that a port ASIC can die and cause forwarding problems.

The "bad server" above, was the only server we had in use on the 37-48 region. So when we switched the port and re-tested, we had the same result because the failing ASIC affected multiple ports.

We replaced the entire switch and that resolved the issue.

  • 1
    You should accept your answer so that it doesn't keep popping up forever looking for an answer.
    – Ron Maupin
    Oct 13, 2015 at 19:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.