5

At one time IPv6 was supposed to have built-in security. I don't know how it was supposed to be implemented, but my guess is that perhaps, if your stack and application supported it, you could simply click a button which would secure the connection in an opportunistic way, or connect securely but fall back to insecure if not supported, similar to how the Philip Zimmerman's zfone works.

What happened to this? Is it in use, or is it an optional feature, which could be implemented down the road? Is it a standard, and what is the name of it?

  • Did any answer help you? If so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you could provide and accept your own answer. – Ron Maupin Aug 13 '17 at 5:58
  • I use the mobile app and I don't see a way to mark one. I want to mark Ricky beams answer as its the most complete one – Justin Goldberg Aug 13 '17 at 15:45
6

To be honest, it's a bit of a botched job. People (including Big Name Vendors) still look at IPSec as a means of tunneling. In IPv6, the IPSec headers were meant to allow any socket from any application to be encrypted. The only system I'm aware of doing this is Cisco's OSPFv3 security.

3

The security bit you're referring to is IPsec.

It exists, is in use, and is pretty cool. But it hasn't yet been applied to all or lots of traffic as was originally dreamed.

From the WP article:

IPsec was developed in conjunction with IPv6 and was originally required to be supported by all standards-compliant implementations of IPv6 before RFC 6434 made it only a recommendation. IPsec is also optional for IPv4 implementations. IPsec is most commonly used to secure IPv4 traffic.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.