0

Say I've got:

  • a home server with a consumer fiber optic Internet connection via FTTH nearing 1gbps downstream/upstream
  • a dedicated server with the exact same hardware specifications in a data center with a data-center-grade 1gbps downstream/upstream link to the Internet

Which connection will be faster? Since there is more congestion at the data center, shouldn't the home connection seem faster?

closed as off-topic by Craig Constantine Apr 22 '16 at 15:03

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "NE is a site for to ask and provide answers about professionally managed networks in a business environment. Your question falls outside the areas our community decided are on topic. Please visit the help center for more details. If you disagree with this closure, please ask on Network Engineering Meta." – Craig Constantine
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • There is not enough information about the data center, but a 1 Gbps link is a 1 Gbps link. Also, questions about home networking are explicitly off-topic here, and most residential ISPs have a restriction about running servers on your home network, and they will probably shut you down. – Ron Maupin Apr 21 '16 at 21:56
0

It's really down to the individual providers.

Residential links are often shared at the pysical layer (PON), datacenter links are usually point to point. So that's a point in favor of the datacenter. Unlikely to be very significant in practice though.

The real question is what is happening further back in the network. A high quality provider will manage their network such that there is enough spare capacity that links rarely get saturated and customers can max out their connections (this generally means that their internal links should be faster than their fastest customer link, e.g. if they have gigabit customer their internal links should be 10 gigabit or better). They will set their pricing such that this is sustainable.

A provider that provides unmetered service at a bargin basement price on the other hand is more likely to leave links congested.

Size of the provider can also matter, a big provider is more likely to have direct peering links to other big providers but on the other hand they are more likely to let peering politics stand in the way of providing a high quality service to their customers.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.