i created a Mac-ACL on a unch of 2960X Switches to limit user access to the internet-gateway only.
mac access-list extended PROTECTED
permit any host ffff.ffff.ffff 0x800 0x0
permit any host ffff.ffff.ffff 0x806 0x0
permit any host ffff.ffff.ffff 0x86DD 0x0
permit any host dead.beef.cafe 0x800 0x0
permit any host dead.beef.cafe 0x806 0x0
permit any host dead.beef.cafe 0x86DD 0x0
deny any any
"dead.beef.cafe" is a Fortinet Firewall.
Using "switchport protected" alone was't an option because this feature is limited to one switch only. The concept of private VLANs wasn't present to me when this solution was implemented.
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
description Room X
switchport access vlan 101
switchport voice vlan 102
switchport mode access
switchport port-security maximum 3 vlan access
switchport port-security
switchport port-security violation protect
mac access-group PROTECTED in
no lldp transmit
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable
end
Today an issue occured with this config. All edge-ports are configured with BPDUGUARD to errdisable the ports when a STP Packet is received. The Mac-ACL acts before BPDUGUARD. So, in the situation when a loop happens between 2 switchports, the ACL is filtering BPDUs and BPDUGUARD has no effect any more.
Unfortunately i wasn't quite familar with the concept of isolated private VLANs when we implemented this network. Meanwhile i see that segmenting the network with private VLANs were a better Solution than using the Mac-ACL. I'd like to avoid redesigning the whole network just to solve this loop issue.
Any suggestions how to solve this?
Regards Andreas
01-80-C2
). I think this is a case of using the correct tool for the job. If you buy a bunch of nails and a screwdriver, you will have a hard time driving the nails with the screwdriver. You need to go back to the store and either get screws or a hammer, rather than ask how to drive the nails with the screwdriver.