Do Bluetooth Devices have MAC address with the same specification as the MAC addresses of the Ethernet and Wi-Fi Network cards?

Question

I recently found out that ZigBee devices have MAC addresses.

ZigBee is more related to Bluetooth from what I know rather than Ethernet or Wi-Fi. Do Bluetooth devices such as phones, headphones, wireless speakers, televisions have MAC addresses also? If yes, are those MAC addresses from the same MAC address pool that the Internet Network Interfaces receive? Are the MAC address for these devices assigned by the same organization which assigns MAC addresses for Network cards?

If a phone or other device like a television has more devices that can receive MAC addresses do they have a different MAC for each device? For example a SMART TV that has a RJ-45 port, has a WI-FI antenna for connecting to the internet and has a Bluetooth antenna to connect headphone or do file transfer do each of those interfaces have a different MAC?

How can the MAC address of a Bluetooth device be found?

Can Bluetooth Protocol be considered as running at level 3 of the OSI stack? (instead of the internet protocol)

From what I know the Ethernet protocol runs at level 2 (the data link level). If those other devices have a MAC that means that MAC is not in any way associated with the Ethernet or internet protocols and is completely independent.

Can the internet protocol run over some other layer that DOES NOT require any kind of MAC?

Answer 1

Bluetooth devices are required to have a unique device address, assigned from the same registry as Ethernet and Wifi MAC addresses. Quoting the Bluetooth specification version 5.0 volume 1:

Each Bluetooth device shall be allocated a unique 48-bit Bluetooth device address (BD_ADDR). The address shall be a 48-bit extended unique identifier (EUI-48) created in accordance with section 8.2 ("Universal addresses") of the IEEE 802-2014 standard.

Manufacturers should only use values from a segment of the registry they purchased from the IEEE Registration Authority, and should use a different values for each interface (Bluetooth, Wifi, Ethernet..) a device has. Serious manufacturers attempt to comply, but goofs happen in production.

Caveat: a Bluetooth device is not required to use its BD_ADDR as the Device Address that it broadcasts. It can use a Random Device Address for this purpose. While there are rules governing the generation and classification of a Random Device Address, they most often do not allow to recognize from its value if the Device Address is random, or a BD_ADDR.

Answer 2

Bluetooth devices are assigned addresses similarly to Ethernet - an organizationally unique identifier (OUI) of 3 bytes followed by another 3 bytes assigned by the vendor. The Bluetooth address of a given device is almost certainly independent of an Ethernet MAC address. Bluetooth OUI lookup tools can be found on Google.

Each device on a Bluetooth network has its own HW address (just like Ethernet). The Bluetooth specification actually lays out both L1 and L2 and, like Ethernet, allows for multiple upper-layer protocols to be mapped (ex: audio streaming, serial, etc) as well as capability negotiation, etc. Bluetooth ends up defining a number of upper-layer protocol functions as well (device naming / discovery, for example).

To your final question - yes, IP can run over media types that don't use MAC addresses. In the context of WAN connections, for example, there is no notion of MAC addressing in point-to-point connections. Similarly in multipoint connections (ATM, FR, etc) there is a direct mapping from IP address to DLCI/PVC. There are similar accommodations in technologies like IPoWDM.

Answer 3

Because BT uses different physical interface or medium than WLAN and Ethernet, a case where BT and WLAN/Ethernet use the same MAC, if any, won't be a problem.