5

I would like that traffic between pppoe users passes through a traffic management device as showed belowenter image description here

I have evarything working, i mean, users have ppp session and they have internet access via a default route in the NAS. But traffic between them doesn't pass throught the traffic management device as they are in the same subnet. I tried to configure a PBR for traffic incoming the in-interface with no success

access-list 100 permit ip any any
!
route-map toallot permit 10
 match ip address 100
 set ip next-hop X.X.X.1
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.1000
 description VLAN_PPPoE
 encapsulation dot1Q 1000
 pppoe enable group PPPOE_SERVER
 ip policy route-map toallot

I implemented this on Imagestream Routers but never on Cisco. Is there any other way to achieve this or PBR is the only way ? Anyone could help me to discover what is going wrong with this pbr config?

2

The policy has to be attached to the individual PPP interface(s), i.e. the virtual-template or dialer that's cloned for each virtual-access interface. G0/1.1000 has no IP protocol running on it, so the policy does nothing.

  • Thanks! I also attached to the Virtual-Template, I can see the access-list match counter increasing all the time, but even with the default route X.X.X.1 unreachable i still can ping from one ppp user to other. – RS1983 Nov 27 '13 at 17:27
  • I achieve in the lab to do this applying the policy to the virtual template and (as I have many subnets in the router) creted an object-group in order to use it in the ACL. Now we put the router in production and seems tha is not working. – RS1983 Dec 14 '13 at 9:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.