We are currently using VSRP (Layer2/3) where we have a single IP as the gateway per VLAN. We are considering moving to VRRP (Layer3) which requires 3 IPs, 1 virtual and 2 real ones. This means that we now need 2 extra IPs from each of our client's VLANs. We can probably persuade our clients to give up those IPs but what I'm worried about is human error. Some of our clients have large IT staff and if we tell a couple people:
- Me: From now on do NOT use .2 and .3
- Client: Sure, no problem, you got it!
- The remaining IT staff forget/didn't read/weren't told
Few months/years later. Someone adds a server with .2 and .3 (I know they will be stupid to do it - but it could happen) and then they blame us for the downtime. Sure, we could show them a copy of the notice with the big red warning and be off the hook as far as our responsibility for the mess, but still, it won't change the fact that they were down. Or let's even say it's not a person who was negligent: let's say their DHCP range was configured 10 years ago to use .2 to .5 and they didn't realize the conflict until a new device was plugged in. Or let's say there is a powered off device that uses .2. Initial ARP audit shows no .2 and everyone agrees that it's safe to take away from the client. A couple of months later they turn on the device, and there is trouble.
Is there a way to eliminate the human error and/or reduce the damage from the assignment of a conflicting IP. By the way, what happens when there is a conflicting gateway anyway? - I'm assuming we'll get intermittent on/off internet connectivity as the conflicting device and the router fight over ARP. Is there a way to block a user device from using a reserved IP in the first place?