All:

Have an testbed configuration where we're running 24 servers with Intel XL710DA1 40G NIC into a switch with 40/100G ports. Trying to use DACs to hold the cost down, but parsing the specs for QSFP+ vs. QSFP28 has been frustrating.

It looks like 40GBase-CR4 requires QSFP+ DACs, but the QSFP28 spec seems to imply that it will step-down (auto-negotiate) from 100G to 40G. If that is true, is there any performance penalty in doing so vs. using QSFP+ DACs?

I've been trying to get some real world recommendations in the 40G space, but so far most folks either go 4x10G to 40G or just ramp up to 100G where QSFP28 is required.

Any insights would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your time,

Ed Kiefer

New contributor
Ed Kiefer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Autonegotiation is up to the port, not the DAC. As long as the port accepts the QSFP28 PHY and links with the far side the port will be fine.

However, it's quite likely that the QSFP+ port will not accept a QSFP28 PHY - check the specs: unless QSFP28 compatibility is explicitly listed it most probably won't work.

The XL710-QDA1's feature support matrix doesn't list compatible QSFP28 DACs.

  • Sorry for the imprecise problem statement WRT ports vs. cables doing the adapting. Going to go with the QFSP+ cables and spend some more $ if/when the environment is upgraded to 100G. Thanks. – Ed Kiefer yesterday
  • Don't forget to vote and/or accept the answer if it is useful and satisfies you. – Zac67 yesterday

Your Answer

Ed Kiefer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.