7

Here is a routing puzzle:

I'm working on a poorly documented network, and I'm trying to document things as I discover them. R1 is a core L3 switch. R2 is a router. The FW is a, well, firewall.

enter image description here

On R1, I see traffic (about 1Mbps) in and out on vlan 19, and it's fairly constant:

R1#sh int vl 19
Vlan19 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is EtherSVI, address is 0008.e3ff.fd90 (bia 0008.e3ff.fd90)
  Internet address is 10.76.85.3/24
<snip>
  5 minute input rate 1175000 bits/sec, 1770 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 1161000 bits/sec, 1751 packets/sec

The only devices that are in the ARP table on that subnet are R1 and R2. The FW seems not to be receiving any traffic:

R1#sh arp | i 10.76.85
Internet  10.76.85.3              -   0008.e3ff.fd90  ARPA   Vlan19
Internet  10.76.85.6             13   00d7.8fcb.2400  ARPA   Vlan19

However, there is no route on R1 where the next hop is R2. There is only the connected interface:

R1#sh ip ro | i 10.76.85
C        10.76.85.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan19
L        10.76.85.3/32 is directly connected, Vlan19

So how to explain the outbound traffic?

R2 also has only two devices in its ARP table:

R2#sh arp | i 10.76.85
Internet  10.76.85.3             17   0008.e3ff.fd90  ARPA   TenGigabitEthernet0/0/0
Internet  10.76.85.6              -   00d7.8fcb.2400  ARPA   TenGigabitEthernet0/0/0

R2 Does have a route (static) with R1 as the next hop:

R2#sh ip ro | i 10.76.85
S        10.76.81.0/24 [1/0] via 10.76.85.3
C        10.76.85.0/24 is directly connected, TenGigabitEthernet0/0/0
L        10.76.85.6/32 is directly connected, TenGigabitEthernet0/0/0

This could explain one way traffic from R2 to R1, but I see outbound traffic from R1 to ...?

These are 10G interfaces, so I can't easily plug a sniffer in. I will eventually be able to span a port and look at the traffic, but until then I'm puzzled. Anyone have any theories?

1
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Ron Maupin
    Mar 10 at 0:06

2 Answers 2

0

If a router doesn't know a route to a certain IP, it would only forward it to a destination for which it has a default route. But with some devices you can also set to flood the traffic to a certain interface without a next-hop IP, so check if there is any sort of a default route set.

0

If R3 can send packets to R1, but R1 cannot send to R3, maybe R1 just sends out replies to its default GW.

5
  • Routers are the gateway, so they do not have default gateways. They may or may not have a default route.
    – Ron Maupin
    Feb 7 at 23:32
  • A default route is the same as default GW. Technically, one can argue that if it is the last routing, the next hop is the final destination and not a GW. Feb 8 at 0:16
  • No, it is not. A default route may lead to a router, or it may lead to something lik a black hole interface on the same router. A PC has a default gateway, but routers do not. A router does not need a default route, but a PC needs a default gateway to use the public Internet. An Internet router can use BGP, and it would then be unlikely to have a default route.
    – Ron Maupin
    Feb 8 at 0:22
  • Well... I have a computer which has its router as the default GW. That GW is behind another router/GW and so on. Feb 8 at 0:34
  • 2
    The equipment in question was decommissioned and we're using a different topology.
    – Ron Trunk
    Feb 8 at 2:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.