2

The CCNA book seems to imply only 2 levels possible under OSPF and IS-IS; I am curious as to if that was all you could do or if you could have further sublevels.

Can link state routing protocols support more than a 2 level hierarchy? Can an area connected to the backbone have its own subordinate area?

  • 1
    Do you really mean all link state protocols in general, or are you asking specifically about OSPF? Because those are two different answers. – Brett Lykins Feb 1 '14 at 13:07
1

Well, both OSPF and IS-IS use two-level hierarchy and that's it (for single process) - you have backbone area (Level 2 in IS-IS, Area 0 in OSPF), and "leafs" - Level 1 in IS-IS and Areas !0 for OSPF. All areas connected to leafs need to somehow connect to area 0 also to avoid routing loops.

Is this design/configuration question or just theoretical question? You can have multi-level hierarchy by (for example) putting different instances on different levels of hierarchy and do redistribution between them.

  • Just theoretical. Putting notes together and writing down definitions, and when the book defined IS-IS L1/L2 and OSPF Area 0/Area !0, I wondered if more than 2 levels could be implemented, connecting to the backbone through another layer or area. – gr0k Feb 1 '14 at 19:34
  • Virtual links(linking a remote area to the backbone through a non-backbone area) can be used to reach the backbone, but this is generally regarded as a temporary workaround, for instance, when making network changes to accomodate a corporate acquisition. – Dave in Ohio Feb 1 '14 at 20:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.