If switches are stacked together using StackWise, what happens if one of the switches goes down? Is switch stacking bad for redundancy?

  • Did any answer help you? If so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you can post and accept your own answer.
    – Ron Maupin
    Commented Dec 16, 2020 at 23:54

2 Answers 2


In theory, a hardware failure on one member of a switch stack will only cause the physical interfaces of that member switch to go down. Uplinks and access ports on other switches will remain online. The “failover” may be faster than a redundant spanning-tree failover. The single spanning tree instance can also prevent outages, particularly in desktop networks where people are plugging in desktop switches.

I encountered two types of problems with redundant switch stacks in production (although most of this was with the VSS cat6k feature, or with Juniper SRX firewall clusters).

  1. The switch stack failover software itself is complicated, and can fail. In effect you have a single control plane. It tries to never fail. It is not always successful.
  2. Software upgrades are particularly dangerous. I’ve run into several “clustered switch” implementations where the upgrade procedure was exceedingly complex (In some cases you had to “break the cluster” as part of the procedure) or where you had to simultaneously reboot both members. Sometimes these upgrade issues only applied to major version number changes but not minor version number changes.

So switch stacks improve redundancy for some types of failures, but increase complexity and impair redundancy for other situations (most notably upgrades).

I personally found switch stacks very helpful in desktop networks (where obtaining a scheduled outage for an impacting upgrade after-hours was not a problem). In the datacenter, where obtaining impacting change windows was almost impossible, I avoided using switch stacks (at least if a server had redundant Ethernet nics, have the two interfaces go to fully independent switches).

  • Hi, Since OP mentioned Stackwise specifically, you may just want to indicate whether this applies to just a Stackwise stack, or switch stacks in general.
    – Spencer
    Commented Aug 4, 2021 at 13:52

If switches are stacked together using StackWise, what happens if one of the switches goes down?

Properly stacked, you only lose the interfaces on that physical switch.

Is switch stacking bad for redundancy?

No. Having a stack of switches can enhance redundancy because you can have multiple uplinks on different physical switches.

Basically, a stack of switches looks like a chassis switch with multiple slots. If the board in one slot dies, the other boards still work if it was not the supervisor board. Stacking actually has a backup supervisor on each physical switch.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.