3

Help me to understand such situation. It is necessary translate a little of config from Screenos to Junos.

Screenos issue:

set vrouter "trust-vr"
set route 217.118.52.149/32 vrouter "TrustGi-vr" preference 20

set vrouter "TrustGi-vr"
set route 172.30.2.8/29 vrouter "trust-vr" preference 20

I would translate as here. Junos issue:

set routing-instances trust-vr instance-type virtual-router
set routing-instances trust-vr routing-options static route 217.118.52.149/32 next-table TrustGi-vr.inet.0


set routing-instances TrustGi-vr instance-type virtual-router
set routing-instances TrustGi-vr routing-options static route 172.30.2.8/29 next-table trust-vr.inet.0

it seems that everything is logical and correct, but the error appears:

[edit routing-instances vrf-trust routing-options static]
root# commit check 
error: [rib vrf-trust.inet.0 routing-options static]
next-table may loop
error: configuration check-out failed

Chance of loops in screenos nobody cared. but in Junos felt that this possibility should be avoided. Tell me how to translate this preferably using Policy-Statements ( not rib-groups).

Improve this question
3
  • Thank you for asking; I'm curious... is this question addressing the same problem as this one?
    – Mike Pennington
    Mar 10, 2014 at 0:08
  • It's like a sequel...!Yet, Essentially two different questions! In the first case, I just wanted to know whether I translate the configuration correctly??? But the problem with this issue is more complicated. I outlined it, I hope intelligibly!
    – Vitaliy
    Mar 10, 2014 at 0:20
  • Did any answer help you? if so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you could provide and accept your own answer.
    – Ron Maupin ♦
    Aug 10, 2017 at 3:18

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

This is expected behaviour - see reference: http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB12985

Google junos auto-export for policy-based solutions

Improve this answer
1
  • 2
    Please consider adding some details to this answers, so it won't be totally dependent on the contents of this link.
    – Teun Vink ♦
    Jul 13, 2015 at 13:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.