It seems that everything I read about wifi says there are only three usable channels in the 2.4 GHz band; however, there are eleven 2.4Ghz wifi channels allowed in the US.

If everyone is using 1, 6 or 11, wouldn’t it make sense to use an unused channel, say, channel 3 for my wifi infrastructure? Or to put the question differently, why can’t I use channels other than 1, 6 and 11?


6 Answers 6


The 2.4GHz band is one of many portions of radio spectrum, called the Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) bands that are allocated for unlicensed use. As long as you operate within the power and antenna limits, you can pretty much do what you want. So the short answer is, you can. But there are very good reasons why you shouldn’t.

Part of the confusion regarding wifi channels comes from the allocation of the frequency spectrum. The ISM band was first allocated in 1958, before most of us were born and well before anyone even imagined wireless networking. The channel definitions were made before wifi was invented, and they assumed 5 MHz spacing.

802.11b and g transmissions require 22MHz bandwidth. Because they’re 22MHz wide, the signal covers two channels above and below the center frequency. So if you use channel 6, your signal spreads across channels 4-8. There is only room in the entire band for three 22MHz wide signals (in the US) without overlapping if they center on channels 1, 6 and 11.

If you transmit your wifi signal between two of these channels, say centered on channel 3, two things happen: your signal interferes with other wifi users on 1 and 6, and their signals interfere with you. This will greatly increase the number of data errors, which in turn will cause retransmissions and significantly reduce your throughput.

It’s as if there are a number of parallel bicycle lanes, and you try to drive a bus down one of them. Although you drive down one lane, your bus will occupy several of the adjacent lanes. If someone happens to be driving their bus in one of those adjacent lanes when your bus goes by, well…it won’t be pretty.

If you only want to use one access point in a remote area with no other wifi signals, then you can probably get a away with using a different channel. But in most urban commercial environments, the 2.4GHz band is pretty crowded. If you use an overlapping channel, you are likely to experience (and cause) interference. If your wireless system is large with many access points, then you will need all three non-overlapping channels to get good coverage. Using something other than 1, 6 or 11 will limit the density of your access points, further reducing throughput.

In summary, it’s good practice to use 1, 6 and 11 to get the maximum use of the radio spectrum with a minimum of interference.

  • 2
    I live in bigger complex -- 10 stories/40 flats -- almost every flat has own home wifi. Wouldn't it be even worse if everyone is using channell 1/6/11? Using you analogy, there would be 1000 cyclists on lane designed for 10.
    – jnovacho
    Commented Mar 21, 2014 at 8:55
  • 11
    @jnovacho, No. It's always better to use 1, 6, or 11 in the U.S. The channel you pick is the center channel used by your signal, not the only channel it uses. As Ron said, wifi signals take up 5 channels (the center channel + 2 on each side of that.) So if, say, you pick channel 4, you're really using channels 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. As such, you're interfering with (and receiving interference from) networks on both channel 1 (which use channels 1-3 [plus some below channel 1]) and channel 6 (which uses channel 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.) The only 3 non-overlapping channels are 1, 6, and 11 (in the U.S.)
    – reirab
    Commented Mar 21, 2014 at 13:47
  • 2
    if everyone in the neighbourhood reduced the transmit power levels on their routers and wifi clients (instead of cranking it to maximum, as many people do), wouldn't that also significantly reduce interference with each other's wireless networks?
    – user1082
    Commented Mar 27, 2014 at 21:03
  • 3
    @user1082: Depends. If two wifi devices on the same channel see and ears each other perfectly, then they will not interfere. They will happily share the channel by trying to not transmit at the same time using CSMA/CA (CA as in collision avoidance, pretty accurate with regard to the lane analogy). If you reduce their power and they don't see themselves as much, CSMA/CA will not work anymore, so they will transmit at the same time and so will interfere. However, if you reduce transmit power level even more, they will interfere less and less.
    – BatchyX
    Commented Mar 27, 2014 at 22:26
  • @user1082 Yes. It’s a friendly move to reduce your transmit power to the lowest setting that still gives you good enough coverage everywhere you need it. This reduces the noise level for your neighbours, giving them better “air quality”.
    – Leon Weber
    Commented Mar 27, 2014 at 22:26

You can use any channel you want, but as others have said channels 1, 6, and 11 are your best bet. The channels overlap each other such that 1, 6, and 11 are the only channels that don't overlap each other. A picture is worth a thousand words, this one is from the Android app Wifi Analyzer:

sample image of overlapping channels

Notice that SSID S, centred on channel 1, gets interference from not just SSID 2412s (which is also on channel 1), but from 2417s on channel 2 and from 2422s on channel 3! However 2347s on channel 6 doesn't interfere with it at all. 2347s also does not interfere with 2362s, on channel 11.

You may need to use a wifi analyzer to find out which channel has the least interference, but bear in mind a lot of devices will change channel automagically. It is possible, though, that you're in an area where the local internet provider uses equipment that all sits on one channel, so you could get lucky. At one point I was in an apartment with 24+ different wifi networks bleeding in... all on channel 1, all gear from same ISP. There were only 3 networks elsewhere. As long as I chose a channel 6 or higher, I had no trouble.

Avoid channel 13 and 14 unless you like the idea of prison, being a prisoner, living the prison lifestyle, etc. You'll get plenty of conflicting advice, a little wifi is not worth running the risk that you have to change your definition of a good day to be "one where I didn't get assaulted until AFTER lunch."

TL;DR version: Yes, you can choose any channel, but assuming an essentially even distribution (a safe assumption in most cases), choosing 1, 6, or 11 will give you best performance since they don't overlap with each other.

  • 2
    Channel 14 (2473-2495 MHz) in the US overlaps with the 2483.5-2495 MHz range, which is reserved for Federal or licensed use and does not allow the use of unlicensed Part 15 devices. Using it put you at risk of potential fines and/or prosecution no matter the power level you use. Channel 13 (2461-2483 MHz) is not approved for use in the US by the 802.11 standards because it abuts so closely with the 2483.5-2495 MHz range without any sort of "buffer" to prevent interference. If your device does "leak" signal above what it should, you could subject yourself to fines and/or prosecution.
    – YLearn
    Commented Jan 22, 2015 at 22:12
  • I'd heard differently, which is a problem. Adjusted that section to be far more sensible.
    – Smithers
    Commented Jan 26, 2015 at 22:33
  • 2
    You are always free to browse the FCC spectrum allocations. As for the punishments, you may have gone a bit overboard; unless you are seriously and maliciously violating FCC regulations, there usually isn't any jail time. However the fines can be somewhat hefty.
    – YLearn
    Commented Jan 27, 2015 at 19:27
  • Thanks for the clarifications! Browsed and could ascertain that this was about the most accessible bit of public law I've ever seen... which is about like finding the prettiest toad. Compared to how easily some equipment allows use of 13/14, it's worth clarifying in common language. Best not to prevail on the FCC's better nature as far as punishment goes... "merely" being broke can lead to a similar lifestyle anyhow. Over wifi.
    – Smithers
    Commented Jan 27, 2015 at 20:15

The problem is, if you DO use Channel 3, you will still get interference from the channels you think you're avoiding. Channel 3 will get interference from channels 1 & 6. Interference from an adjacent channel is more disruptive to both you and your neighbours than same channel.


Channel 3 may or may not interfere with 1 & 6, it depends on where the other nodes are. If your AP is in the same room and close there will be no interference because signal strength will be high enough. In that case using 1 6 11 will cause sharing / pauses. If one person is on ch3 then throughput is increased and no pauses. In a crowded 1 6 11 there is waiting to transmit. But not for the person switched to ch3. If you could plan everybody's channel then using inbetween channels could be more efficient. However on very dense schemes.this idea may break down. It depends on signal strengths.


I don't know how so many network people parrot the "1, 6, or 11 ONLY" rule from a Cisco whitepaper that has nothing to do with a home or small office network. My AT&T Arris gateway automatically selects the "best" 2.4 GHz channel from 1, 6 or 11. It selected Ch 1,and my speed was 29 Mbps with lots of error correction on a 100 Mbps line. On a WiFi analyzer, you can clearly see the problem with using only 1, 6, or 11 "because they don't overlap" But the channels overlap by design, and various orthogonal and spread spectrum modulation methods let them coexist with little or no interference. But nothing degrades speed and causes errors as much as having multiple strong signals on a single channel. I have to go into the setup menu to change to Ch 8, (are you sure you want to make this change? Really sure?) and wireless speed is 90 Mbps.![WiFi analyzer channels]]1

  • I’ll admit that this rule is based on older modulation techniques. I would be interested in seeing some study, not just your anecdotal evidence.
    – Ron Trunk
    Commented Oct 10, 2022 at 23:53

Just randomly browsing the key terms "Wifi" and "Channel 3".. it's gonna be different for everyone. For me, channel 1, 6 and 11 simply do not work. There's way too much interference and my wireless mouse keeps skipping. My wireless keyboard also lags (A LOT). I set the router to channel 3 and the internet sped up about 5%, and also the wireless mouse and keyboard stopped lagging/skipping.

  • 5
    It is answers like this that actually makes things worse. When you set your device to channel 3, you are now actually interfering with both channels 1 and 6, making them less usable for those around you. Unfortunately, this is all too common in many residential areas where those who don't know any better use any random channel (and often supported by consumer devices that auto-select channels other than 1, 6, and 11).
    – YLearn
    Commented Dec 12, 2014 at 0:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.