1

We know there's the the IEEE 802.11s mesh amendment that operates on the L2 MAC layer

There's also the Wi-Fi Alliance's "Wi-Fi CERTIFIED EasyMesh™" thingy for bringing mesh interpretability to devices from different vendors.

It confuses me on what's the relation between them, especially that i don't read 802.11s in the EasyMesh specs, but i have trouble fully understand that specs.

Are 802.11s and EasyMesh independent? Is one depend on the other? Are they mutually exclusive? Does EasyMesh enforces nodes to be on 802.11s, or maybe it's defining it's own Layer 3 mesh formation (which might contradicts 11s)?

Thanks!

0
2

IEEE 802.11s and EasyMesh are different and independent. 802.11s was created by IEEE some years back, when "mesh networks" were mostly infrastructure mesh networks, e.g., routers on top of buildings providing Internet connectivity over a region. These days, IoT is blossoming, and EasyMesh was designed partly to support IoT.

There are differences in architecture. 802.11s introduces the concept of mesh stations, which may be co-located with APs but are otherwise different from APs or regular stations. The mesh/ad-hoc network is built with mesh stations. On the other hand, EasyMesh builds mesh networks with multi-AP devices. A multi-AP device contains a fronthaul AP to communicate with regular stations, but also may contain a backhaul station (that communicates with another multi-AP device's fronthaul AP .. the mesh is built on such connections), or a multi-AP controller.

1

IEEE 802.11s is an internationally approved standard. IEEE is a Standards Developing Organization (SDO). Wi-Fi Alliance is not an SDO. The EasyMesh specification does not qualify as standard.

IEEE 802.11s defines a self-organizing, layer-2 multi-hop network. IEEE 802.11s seamlessly integrates with any other IEEE 802 network. It works transparently. Thus, it supports spanning-tree and other L2 messages. With IEEE 802.11s, mesh stations may connect with one or more other mesh stations.

In contrast, EasyMesh always forms a tree structure. There is a root AP. Other APs connect to the root. In upstream direction (towards the root), devices behave as clients. In downstream direction, devices act as APs. Thus, EasyMesh is able using the traditional WPA2 encryption scheme. IEEE 802.11s, however, does not specify such hierarchy. All nodes are on the same level. Hence, IEEE 802.11s cannot use the hierarchical WPA encryption method. Instead, IEEE 802.11s relies on Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE) that permits either end of a link to initiate a key exchange. In contrast, WPA2 always relies on the hierarchy of authenticator and supplicant.

Conceptually, IEEE 802.11s is much more advanced and modern than EasyMesh. However, it's not widely supported by the industry. EasyMesh, in contrast, is a quick and dirty hack. However, EasyMesh also supports non-mesh aspects (e.g. ISPs may use it peek into their customer's deployment to help them optimize their Wi-Fi).

There are many more differences. In summary: 802.11s is in the Linux kernel, also Google uses it. However, all in all, there is little support for it. In contrast, there are many more commercial products that support EasyMesh. However, EasyMesh is far from being a success. It does come way too late and most Wi-Fi mesh solutions use proprietary solutions that are non-interoperable.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.