I have a pair of Dell PowerConnect 2724 switches that I'd like to stack. One switch will host components like the router, wi-fi access point, network printers, servers, etc. The other switch will be hosting various wired devices in a separate location. Reading through what I could find, I'm rather unclear as to what I need to do. I guess it doesn't help that I've gotten rusty on the more advanced concepts of network engineering, having not needed to deal with it for over a decade. Is there a guide on the steps needed to handle this in the most reliable fashion while also incorporating at least two cables for connection to increase throughput between switches? I want to make sure that there isn't too much of a bottleneck between the switches when there's a lot of simultaneous server access and internet access.


I realize "stacking" might not be the most correct term for what I'm attempting to accomplish, but at the moment it's the closest term that I can think of.

1 Answer 1


I don't think the 2724 switches support stacking (making both chassis act as a single switch).

If more bandwidth is required than a single link provides, you can create a link aggregation group (LAG) with up to four ports:

Aggregating Ports

Link Aggregation optimizes port usage by linking a group of ports together to form a single LAG (aggregated group). Aggregating ports multiplies the bandwidth between the devices, increases port flexibility, and provides link redundancy. Consider the following when aggregating ports:

  • Link Aggregation is allowed between two devices only.
  • All ports within a LAG must be the same media type.
  • A VLAN is not configured on the port.
  • The port is not assigned to a different LAG.
  • An available MAC address exists which can be assigned to a port.
  • Auto-negotiation mode is not configured on the port.
  • The port is in full-duplex mode.
  • All ports in the LAG have the same ingress filtering and tagged modes.
  • All ports in the LAG have the same back pressure and flow control modes.
  • All ports in the LAG have the same priority.
  • All ports in the LAG have the same transceiver type.
  • The device supports up to six LAGs, and up to four ports in each LAG.

Ports added to a LAG do not their individual port configuration. When ports are removed from the LAG, the original port configuration is applied to the ports. The device considers an Aggregated Link a single logical port.



  • Thank you, this is what I was looking for. Just wasn't really sure what it was called or if the switches supported it. Commented Apr 20, 2023 at 20:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.