Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Ricky
  • 32.6k
  • 2
  • 44
  • 85

Not even remotely. There are no mechanisms for signaling a dropped frame (or why it was dropped -- CRC error, too small ("runt"), too big, no buffer space), thus there is no means to know what needs to be resent. There are no sequence numbers in ethernet frames -- the payload may contain one.

The only time ethernet will resend a frame is when the transmitter knows a collision occurred. But with 99.99999% of gear being full duplex today, collisions never happen.

BTW, this is why iSCSI SANs use special switches with very large internal, per-port buffers. And why FCoRFCoE (fibre channel over ethernet) uses special hardware. Both require a reliable transport, and ethernet on it's own isn't.

Not even remotely. There are no mechanisms for signaling a dropped frame (or why it was dropped -- CRC error, too small ("runt"), too big, no buffer space), thus there is no means to know what needs to be resent. There are no sequence numbers in ethernet frames -- the payload may contain one.

The only time ethernet will resend a frame is when the transmitter knows a collision occurred. But with 99.99999% of gear being full duplex today, collisions never happen.

BTW, this is why iSCSI SANs use special switches with very large internal, per-port buffers. And why FCoR (fibre channel over ethernet) uses special hardware. Both require a reliable transport, and ethernet on it's own isn't.

Not even remotely. There are no mechanisms for signaling a dropped frame (or why it was dropped -- CRC error, too small ("runt"), too big, no buffer space), thus there is no means to know what needs to be resent. There are no sequence numbers in ethernet frames -- the payload may contain one.

The only time ethernet will resend a frame is when the transmitter knows a collision occurred. But with 99.99999% of gear being full duplex today, collisions never happen.

BTW, this is why iSCSI SANs use special switches with very large internal, per-port buffers. And why FCoE (fibre channel over ethernet) uses special hardware. Both require a reliable transport, and ethernet on it's own isn't.

Source Link
Ricky
  • 32.6k
  • 2
  • 44
  • 85

Not even remotely. There are no mechanisms for signaling a dropped frame (or why it was dropped -- CRC error, too small ("runt"), too big, no buffer space), thus there is no means to know what needs to be resent. There are no sequence numbers in ethernet frames -- the payload may contain one.

The only time ethernet will resend a frame is when the transmitter knows a collision occurred. But with 99.99999% of gear being full duplex today, collisions never happen.

BTW, this is why iSCSI SANs use special switches with very large internal, per-port buffers. And why FCoR (fibre channel over ethernet) uses special hardware. Both require a reliable transport, and ethernet on it's own isn't.