Timeline for Impact on Firewall with IP camera network attached
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2017 at 4:41 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | Did any answer help you? if so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you could provide and accept your own answer. | |
| Jun 20, 2015 at 16:48 | history | edited | Mike Pennington |
edited tags
|
|
| May 26, 2015 at 18:41 | comment | added | Matt Fogleman | That's what I figured, but I wanted to be certain. There is going to be 8 VPN tunnels coming to that firewall, as well as acting as the main firewall for our main office, I just didn't want to overwork it. Thanks for your reply. | |
| May 26, 2015 at 16:06 | answer | added | Ronnie Smith | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 26, 2015 at 15:34 | comment | added | Gerben | What do you think might impact the performance? Video recording traffic will stay local, only viewing video from the LAN will travel through the firewall. How many people will be watching the videos? You mention address assignment, but assigning addresses to 150 shouldn't really be a lot of work. | |
| May 26, 2015 at 15:32 | answer | added | KorXo | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 26, 2015 at 13:52 | history | asked | Matt Fogleman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |