Timeline for What is "Twisted pair with loading" cable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 at 8:34 | comment | added | jcbermu | @ToddWilcox That's true. To provide DSL the telco have to remove or replace the old coils with ones which are transparent to DSL. | |
| May 19, 2016 at 15:38 | comment | added | Todd Wilcox | If I understand correctly,. loading coils have been removed and/or made unnecessary in many areas (of the US, at least) because it is not possible to provide DSL through a loading coil, so during the DSL boom, last mile infrastructure in the US was upgraded in many areas to remove/bypass loading coils. The number I remember for the distance between loading coils on a POTs line was 10,000 feet, which is why DSL required one to be less than 10,000 feet from the nearest central office. | |
| May 19, 2016 at 13:28 | history | edited | jcbermu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 29 characters in body
|
| May 19, 2016 at 11:23 | vote | accept | user5653890 | ||
| May 19, 2016 at 11:20 | comment | added | user5653890 | Thanks, I have searched the internet after reading your comment and found this useful for future readers; earlier i was looking into wrong direction. :: link | |
| May 19, 2016 at 11:18 | history | edited | jcbermu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 409 characters in body
|
| May 19, 2016 at 11:06 | history | answered | jcbermu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |