Timeline for Palo Alto - What's the big deal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2017 at 14:39 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | Did any answer help you? if so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you could provide and accept your own answer. | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 16:02 | comment | added | Jason Mann | With the ASA X sieries, they are now able to do inspection at layer 7, granted you have to purchase a module to the inspection. | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 22:29 | answer | added | user8162 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 | answer | added | AdnanG | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 10:40 | answer | added | What Lies Beneath | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 10, 2013 at 3:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackNetworkEng/status/377270029341163520 | ||
| Sep 7, 2013 at 1:15 | comment | added | coxley | Of course. I'm just wanting to know the strengths Palo Alto might have over the ASA so I can gauge a better idea for how it should be implemented. | |
| Sep 7, 2013 at 1:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 7, 2013 at 7:09 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2013 at 1:15 | history | notice added | Mike Pennington | Needs detailed answers | |
| Sep 7, 2013 at 1:14 | history | reopened | Mike Pennington | ||
| Sep 7, 2013 at 1:12 | comment | added | Mike Pennington | @CraigConstantine, definitely on topic, but even on topic questions can be too subjective. Thus, I am more focused on how subjective the comparison is... if you ask for an open ended to comparison of two vendors equipment, one vendor may feel shortchanged and post a rebuttal... then, the other vendor rep points out how the rebuttal is full of fluff... then a 3rd vendor chimes in that their product should be considered... Hopefully we can avoid all this... | |
| Sep 7, 2013 at 1:05 | comment | added | coxley | Maybe after I play around with Juniper more, I'll be able to gain a solid opinion on it then. I have edited the question as requested. | |
| Sep 7, 2013 at 1:03 | history | edited | coxley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed question about CLI
|
| Sep 6, 2013 at 14:20 | comment | added | one.time | The CLI of the Palo Alto is fully featured and is similar to that of a Juniper's CLI hierarchy. | |
| Sep 6, 2013 at 13:46 | comment | added | Craig Constantine | "model/product line features/differences" are specifically on topic... I think this should be re-opened. Thoughts? | |
| Sep 6, 2013 at 9:21 | comment | added | Pavel Glushkov | As far as I know, Palo Alto devices (just like Check Point they originated from) should be configured via GUI (Panorama). CLI is used for basic ip-address assignment and hardcore troubleshooting, but not for security configuration. | |
| Sep 6, 2013 at 2:31 | history | closed | Mike Pennington | Opinion-based | |
| Sep 6, 2013 at 2:24 | comment | added | Mike Pennington | The part about the CLI being strange is too subjective... let's remove that part. I am undecided about the comparison with ASA. We can reopen after you edit the question. | |
| Sep 6, 2013 at 2:18 | history | edited | Mike Pennington |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 6, 2013 at 2:09 | history | asked | coxley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |