Timeline for Optimising a Series Asymetrical Wireless Radio Connection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 10, 2017 at 0:41 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | Did any answer help you? if so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you could provide and accept your own answer. | |
Jul 11, 2015 at 12:08 | comment | added | Pieter | Is all the links wireless ? e.g. Will B and C be repeating incoming traffic out again over wifi ? | |
Mar 13, 2015 at 0:34 | answer | added | it_monkey | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 18:28 | comment | added | YLearn | @RickyBeam, thank you for your first hand knowledge and appreciate your input, for as I mentioned I haven't used them. The datasheet does indeed mention 11a/11g/11n (took me a bit to find though as it only appears in the tables at -90 degrees). Only other mention of wifi/802.11 I found in the data sheet was this line: "Unlike standard WiFi protocol, Ubiquiti's Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) AirMax protocol <snip>." This was much more prominent and when I had discussed this product with them they only mentioned that AirMax was better than 802.11 (and not that it supported it as well). | |
Oct 3, 2013 at 3:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackNetworkEng/status/385605784954212352 | ||
Oct 2, 2013 at 0:56 | comment | added | Ricky | I've used numerous nano stations for public wifi. yes, they make models that operate outside the usual a and b bands. Read the datasheets; the 2.4GHz and 5GHz devices can operate in wifi or airmax modes. (in fact dd-wrt is supported on some of them) | |
Oct 2, 2013 at 0:07 | comment | added | YLearn | @RickyBeam, RocketM and NanoStation are two of the hardware offerings in the AirMax line of products. While they can operate in the same unlicensed frequencies and have some similarities to 802.11, they do not conform to the IEEE standards, nor can you connect an 802.11 device to them. I haven't used them personally in a deployment and could be wrong so please feel free to provide links if this is the case, but that was my understanding the last time I considered them for a customer's deployment. | |
Oct 1, 2013 at 23:08 | history | edited | Mike Pennington | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 47 characters in body; edited title
|
Oct 1, 2013 at 20:45 | comment | added | Ricky | nobody said anything about AirMax(tm). everything listed can operate as standard 802.11b/g hardware. | |
Oct 1, 2013 at 20:39 | history | edited | Daniel Yuste Aroca | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2013 at 17:53 | comment | added | YLearn | This site is new (still in beta) and I am not sure if we have any Ubiquiti experts here yet. IIRC the AirMax products are proprietary wireless devices, not IEEE standards based. I hate to point you elsewhere, but you may find better luck posting at the Ubiquiti Community forums. I hope to be proven wrong though and hope you get a great answer here. | |
Oct 1, 2013 at 17:43 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 1, 2013 at 18:34 | |||||
Oct 1, 2013 at 17:27 | history | asked | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |