Timeline for Possibilities to switch between primary and backup radios between locations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2017 at 1:04 | comment | added | Ronnie Smith | I understand, yet Ethernet won, ...like 20 years ago. There is certainly much FUD around Wide-Area Ethernet, yet, it's inevitable. | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 0:29 | comment | added | rnxrx | There is no universe where a given L2 solution is more robust than L3. More convenient in the short run? Sure. But robust? One episode of unknown unicast flooding or broadcast/multicast storms will put that to rest.. | |
| Jan 30, 2017 at 19:24 | comment | added | Ronnie Smith | Layer 3 partitioning will provide you greatest and most predictable control. | |
| Jan 30, 2017 at 18:05 | comment | added | atapaka | I do not need L2 solution, I just consider it more robust, considering that L3 solution which has been suggested to me seems to be very complex. I prefer logical network grouping of devices, as this creates a significant simplification to security rules (routing, nat etc) and thus it is less prone to error (forgetting a particular rule when changes are made leads to opened hole). But maybe I am wrong, maybe there is a way to do it in L3. I just have not heard about it yet. | |
| Jan 30, 2017 at 17:01 | history | answered | Ronnie Smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |