Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 2, 2017 at 17:31 comment added Ecnerwal The only real advantage I see to POE over injector-bricks (I use both) is that it does offer the ability to power-cycle a misbehaving device without having to make a physical visit to the location of the injector, assuming you can get to the management access of the switch. Folks with a neatnik bent complain about the clutter of having POE bricks, but it's easily managed. For the most part POE switches are still carrying a prohibitively high price-tag, IMHO.
Mar 2, 2017 at 17:21 comment added user34833 Thanks for noticing that. I have about 10 POE devices that each have their own power supply. I'm weighing options between SFP+, POE, and price. Price is certainly the most important at this point. POE vs SFP+ is what I'm running into right now. Let me know if you have any suggestions for all three options. Otherwise, I think I'll take SFP+ over POE
Mar 1, 2017 at 22:51 comment added Ecnerwal I thought you wanted a POE switch? That does not appear to be POE, though it certainly has many ports (which your diagram is not showing me you actually need) and is cheap.
Mar 1, 2017 at 21:05 comment added user34833 Thanks! I'm thinking of re-choosing my switches to the Quanta LB4M. They have SFP+, which can operate at 10Gb. I think what I'll do is run 6a from each switch, and fiber between switches. Any other suggestions?
Mar 1, 2017 at 21:05 vote accept CommunityBot
Mar 1, 2017 at 19:55 history edited Ecnerwal CC BY-SA 3.0
added 987 characters in body
Mar 1, 2017 at 19:20 history edited Ecnerwal CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2026 characters in body
Mar 1, 2017 at 18:18 comment added user34833 Thanks for the suggestion, I edited the post with more information. How would you recommend connecting the switches via fiber? (I posted the switch model in the original question)
Mar 1, 2017 at 14:20 history edited Ecnerwal CC BY-SA 3.0
added 84 characters in body
Mar 1, 2017 at 14:12 history answered Ecnerwal CC BY-SA 3.0