Timeline for Is this a valid supernetting range for OSPF range command?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2019 at 0:38 | history | edited | Ron Maupin♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 28, 2018 at 2:51 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 29, 2017 at 2:32 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 29, 2017 at 1:34 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 30, 2017 at 9:35 | comment | added | manish ma | To avoid confusion, better enable OSPF per interface. | |
| Oct 29, 2017 at 23:37 | history | edited | Ron Maupin♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2017 at 23:33 | answer | added | Ron Maupin♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 29, 2017 at 23:25 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ |
A supernet is combining two or more networks into a smaller prefix. If you have If you have some larger prefixes, e.g. /25, you can combine them to a supernet with any smaller prefix, e.g. /22. I think you need to study the excellent answer to this question.
|
|
| Oct 29, 2017 at 23:22 | comment | added | dexterous | Basically, my question is about supernetting , is it correct to supernet the network of 10.128.0.0 with a subnet of 24? Shouldn't that be a subnet of 16? | |
| Oct 29, 2017 at 23:16 | history | asked | dexterous | CC BY-SA 3.0 |