Timeline for IPV6 static Routing
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2020 at 17:45 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | Did any answer help you? If so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you can post and accept your own answer. | |
| Jun 22, 2020 at 13:53 | history | edited | Jordan Head | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed CLI formatting
|
| S Jun 20, 2020 at 8:49 | history | suggested | auspicious99 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
grammar and spelling
|
| Jun 20, 2020 at 4:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 20, 2020 at 8:49 | |||||
| Jun 19, 2020 at 23:25 | answer | added | alvarezp | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 10, 2020 at 12:08 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ |
You are also using invalid addressing on your serial interfaces. The fc00::/10 addressing used to be Site-Local addressing, but that was deprecated years ago: "Site-Local addresses were originally designed to be used for addressing inside of a site without the need for a global prefix. Site-local addresses are now deprecated as defined in [SLDEP]...The special behavior of this prefix defined in [RFC3513] must no longer be supported in new implementations."
|
|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 4:21 | answer | added | Ricky | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 9, 2020 at 23:36 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 10, 2020 at 3:40 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2020 at 23:32 | history | asked | Redi Ramaj | CC BY-SA 4.0 |