Timeline for Do we represent software in network physical diagram?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 18, 2020 at 18:14 | vote | accept | I Love Stackoverflow | ||
Oct 4, 2020 at 19:14 | comment | added | I Love Stackoverflow | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
Oct 4, 2020 at 18:43 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | @ILoveStackoverflow That's an entire different question that's been asked before, just search. Essentially, you need to have a wireless survey done as there's no simple answer (depends on building layout and materials, geographical spread, workloads, ...). You might get away with as few as 10 but might require more than 100 WAPs. | |
Oct 4, 2020 at 18:33 | comment | added | I Love Stackoverflow | @Zac67 If I have to support 200-300 devices(tablets, Laptop ) then how many access points I would require? | |
Oct 4, 2020 at 17:59 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | A cloud service is a logical construct, so not a part of a physical diagram - that stops at the WAN port. | |
Oct 4, 2020 at 17:58 | comment | added | I Love Stackoverflow | @Zac67 But with physical network, cloud services cannot be part of it? | |
Oct 4, 2020 at 17:53 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | You need to create separate diagrams for the physical network topology (cabling and cable plants, closets, ...), and for the logical network (routes, locations and interconnects, possibly services). For complex services you should consider additional diagrams. | |
Oct 4, 2020 at 17:37 | comment | added | I Love Stackoverflow | You mentioned that Cloud applications don't belong to a physical network diagram. Can you explain why? Just wanted to know, please. Also upvoted for your kind efforts towards helping me | |
Oct 4, 2020 at 17:33 | history | answered | Jeff Wheeler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |