Timeline for Cisco SFP module: Determing Priority?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 at 20:43 | comment | added | Keven Culp | @YLearn Correct. | |
| May 24, 2013 at 17:53 | comment | added | YLearn | I would not take "even temporarily" to mean no frames lost. I would take this as not noticeable to the end user or application. As such, it depends on flavor of STP. | |
| May 24, 2013 at 11:51 | comment | added | ytti | What Keven is asking is not really possible 'even temporarily' means no frames lost during convergence to me. Even LACP is not guaranteed safe to remove/add ports (the protocol allows for such guarantee, but does not force such implementation). STP certainly causes short outage. | |
| May 23, 2013 at 20:41 | history | answered | Daniel Yuste Aroca | CC BY-SA 3.0 |