Does 4500x-16s support 10/100 network devices? My vendor says that it is not able to and one of my devices can only support 10/100.
-
You can use the GLC-T or GLC-TE SFP in your switch which gives you 10/100/1000 cobber interface. You can see all supported SFP's here: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/GE_Tx_Matrix.html#_Toc490141220– user36472Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 13:47
Add a comment
|
3 Answers
You can use the GLC-T or GLC-TE SFP (1000BASE-T) in your switch which gives you 10/100/1000 copper interface. This SFP supports Category 5, 5e, 6, or 6a UTP/FTP copper cables.
You can see all supported SFP's for the Cisco 4500X here:
-
Thanks. I'm confused with this statement on Cisco website which sounds contradictiory to me - "When you install the GLC-T (1000Base-T) SFP transceiver, 10/100 Mbps with auto negotiation is not supported." link. Yet the feature list says "Forced 10/100 Autonegotiation" is supported. So does using the GLC-T SPF transceiver allow a 10/100 ethernet device to connect to the 4500X? Btw, my 4500X only has fibre optics ports so my vendor used a small silver color adapter for my 10/100 device.– JoshuaCommented Aug 19, 2017 at 4:38
-
Wouldn't be the first time Cisco wrote something contradictory. Worked fine with 100 Mbit full duplex, tested yesterday.– user36472Commented Aug 19, 2017 at 8:33
-
-
@Joshua 3.8.4E MD– user36472Commented Aug 19, 2017 at 11:05
Not likely. Cisco list no 100 Mbit modules.
Edit: the 1000BASE-T SFP should be able to link 10/100 Mbit/s.
-
Well while you are right about the modules that are not supported, the GLC-T SFP is still supported on the 4500X series, which gives the 10/100/1000 cobber capability. SFP+ is compatible with all normal SFP modules.– user36472Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 13:43
-
-
@RonMaupin yay was faster than you!– user36472Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 13:47
-
-
@RonMaupin ROFL– user36472Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 13:52
1000BASE-T SFP is recommended, which can well support both 10 and 100 Mbps
-
1This answer has already be given by @Cown (but more detailed, and it was accepted). You should consider upvoting the existing answer rather than creating a not-this-good duplicate.– JFLCommented Sep 15, 2017 at 14:51