Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with vss
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 630
For questions about Cisco Virtual Switching System (VSS). For instance, you want to convert your 6500 Series switches with Supervisor 2T to run as one virtual switch. Therefore you have questions about how to enable VSS and what to consider before doing so.
11
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Does Cisco 6500 VSS improve or hurt MTBF?
I understand the benefits of the Cisco 6500 VSS with the obvious selling points of single management, single routing instance, STP elimination, port-channels across chassis, etc. … In a VSS world -- and I have no direct experience with this -- we now have software and other protocols that control both switches. …
- 7,134