Skip to main content
replaced http://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/ with https://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Please click here for the reference link.Please click here for the reference link.

I agree with the comments from Ryan and the answer provided by RahulKrishnan R A that we have to declare the interface as point-to-point in order to carry the mask for the loopback interface that's is configured with a mask other than /32.

My question is: in this case, what will be the LinkID for that link? Since for point-to-point the LinkID is supposed to be the 'Neighbor Router ID', what will it's value be for the loopback - which actually is a stub and has no neighbor.

May be that's one of the reasons a Juniper router doesn't allow a loopback address other than /32 for ipv4.

Please click here for the reference link.

I agree with the comments from Ryan and the answer provided by RahulKrishnan R A that we have to declare the interface as point-to-point in order to carry the mask for the loopback interface that's is configured with a mask other than /32.

My question is: in this case, what will be the LinkID for that link? Since for point-to-point the LinkID is supposed to be the 'Neighbor Router ID', what will it's value be for the loopback - which actually is a stub and has no neighbor.

May be that's one of the reasons a Juniper router doesn't allow a loopback address other than /32 for ipv4.

Please click here for the reference link.

I agree with the comments from Ryan and the answer provided by RahulKrishnan R A that we have to declare the interface as point-to-point in order to carry the mask for the loopback interface that's is configured with a mask other than /32.

My question is: in this case, what will be the LinkID for that link? Since for point-to-point the LinkID is supposed to be the 'Neighbor Router ID', what will it's value be for the loopback - which actually is a stub and has no neighbor.

May be that's one of the reasons a Juniper router doesn't allow a loopback address other than /32 for ipv4.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackNetworkEng/status/535159703949803520
deleted 159 characters in body
Source Link
Mike Pennington
  • 30k
  • 12
  • 81
  • 153

Please click here for the reference link.

I agree with the comments from Ryan and the answer provided by RahulKrishnan R A that we have to declare the interface as point-to-point in order to carry the mask for the loopback interface that's is configured with a mask other than /32.

My question is: in this case, what will be the LinkID for that link? Since for point-to-point the LinkID is supposed to be the 'Neighbor Router ID', what will it's value be for the loopback - which actually is a stub and has no neighbor.

May be that's one of the reasons a Juniper router doesn't allow a loopback address other than /32 for ipv4.

Thanks.

P.S: I'm not allowed to make a comment, that's why I am using the answering option. In response please feel free to use comments option. Regards

Please click here for the reference link.

I agree with the comments from Ryan and the answer provided by RahulKrishnan R A that we have to declare the interface as point-to-point in order to carry the mask for the loopback interface that's is configured with a mask other than /32.

My question is: in this case, what will be the LinkID for that link? Since for point-to-point the LinkID is supposed to be the 'Neighbor Router ID', what will it's value be for the loopback - which actually is a stub and has no neighbor.

May be that's one of the reasons a Juniper router doesn't allow a loopback address other than /32 for ipv4.

Thanks.

P.S: I'm not allowed to make a comment, that's why I am using the answering option. In response please feel free to use comments option. Regards

Please click here for the reference link.

I agree with the comments from Ryan and the answer provided by RahulKrishnan R A that we have to declare the interface as point-to-point in order to carry the mask for the loopback interface that's is configured with a mask other than /32.

My question is: in this case, what will be the LinkID for that link? Since for point-to-point the LinkID is supposed to be the 'Neighbor Router ID', what will it's value be for the loopback - which actually is a stub and has no neighbor.

May be that's one of the reasons a Juniper router doesn't allow a loopback address other than /32 for ipv4.

Source Link
Rais
  • 352
  • 1
  • 6

OSPF LinkID for the Loopback Interface Configured as Point-to-Point on a Cisco Router

Please click here for the reference link.

I agree with the comments from Ryan and the answer provided by RahulKrishnan R A that we have to declare the interface as point-to-point in order to carry the mask for the loopback interface that's is configured with a mask other than /32.

My question is: in this case, what will be the LinkID for that link? Since for point-to-point the LinkID is supposed to be the 'Neighbor Router ID', what will it's value be for the loopback - which actually is a stub and has no neighbor.

May be that's one of the reasons a Juniper router doesn't allow a loopback address other than /32 for ipv4.

Thanks.

P.S: I'm not allowed to make a comment, that's why I am using the answering option. In response please feel free to use comments option. Regards