Timeline for CISCO CUBE is as SBC suitable for ISP
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2017 at 14:45 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | Did any answer help you? If so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you can provide your own answer and accept it. | |
| Nov 25, 2015 at 16:43 | answer | added | dodger | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 15:30 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2015 at 8:13 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 59 characters in body
|
| Nov 19, 2015 at 16:08 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | The voice engineering team is not part of my network engineering team. I don't have any details, but I do know they don't use any of the old 7600 equipment. Some (maybe all) of the nodes must handle over 16,000 simultaneous calls. Cisco eats their own dog food and uses CUBE. There are papers about how it was accomplished, and, as I wrote before, Cisco is very willing to answer any specific questions you may have about CUBE. | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 16:01 | comment | added | kockiren | Hey Ron this is a useful information, do you have experience with over 16,000 simultaneous calls on one ASR or what kind of hardware you use? Do you use CUBE or the old SBC on a 7600 Series? | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 15:03 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | All I can tell you about that is that we have over 250,000 employees, and we have been steadily moving them all to a unified Cisco VoIP solution. | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 14:27 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 345 characters in body
|
| Nov 19, 2015 at 13:18 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Nov 19, 2015 at 9:19 | comment | added | kockiren | Thx Ron, it goes in the right direction. In your linked documents I can find a lot of marketing material but not concrete answer to my Question and no Experience. Does anyone knows a success story with a CUBE as a SBC? | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 8:03 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | I removed the question leading to opinions, and I added some more links to my answer, one of which shows that it meets your list. | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 8:02 | history | edited | Ron Maupin♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 73 characters in body
|
| Nov 19, 2015 at 7:33 | history | edited | Ron Maupin♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Nov 19, 2015 at 7:19 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
specify the question
|
| Nov 19, 2015 at 6:59 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
ask concrete question to explain I do not want opinions but experience or success Storys.
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 14:35 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 15:56 | |||||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 14:30 | answer | added | Ron Maupin♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 14:27 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
change the question from best practice to special CUBE experience
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 14:25 | comment | added | kockiren | Hey Ron, I want to know if the CUBE System from Cisco is useable as SBC in a carrier grade environment. I ask it because I hear from other engineers that Cisco (VoiP support) is not suitable in Carriergrade environments and now I want to hear a statement about the Cisco CUBE system as SBC. How can I change my Question above? | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 14:19 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | The answers to this question would seem to be primarily opinion-based, which is off-topic. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 12:05 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 10:46 | history | edited | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 7:43 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 14:14 | |||||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 7:39 | history | asked | kockiren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |