Timeline for What is difference between "topology of network" and "geometry of network"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2019 at 16:13 | vote | accept | Questioner | ||
| Feb 27, 2019 at 16:10 | answer | added | Zac67♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 15:56 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | @RonMaupin I was thinking along the same lines ("bisection bandwidth", ...) but I wouldn't call that "geometry". | |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 14:53 | comment | added | Ron Maupin♦ | I suppose things like a spanning tree diameter could be referred to as the geometry. | |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 13:14 | comment | added | Questioner | I edited my question. | |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 13:14 | history | edited | Questioner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 178 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2019 at 13:11 | comment | added | user36472 | @Zac67 you should post that as an answer. | |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 11:34 | history | edited | Questioner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 27, 2019 at 10:59 | comment | added | Zac67♦ | Most of the time "network geometry" doesn't make too much sense. You build networks as a bus, in stars, trees, rings but these are topologies. Above the actual topology you might use "architecture" for a more abstract scope. | |
| Feb 27, 2019 at 10:40 | history | edited | user36472 |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 27, 2019 at 10:18 | history | asked | Questioner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |