4

Some ISPs are doing QoS based on traffic type (online streaming), such as Comcast and Cogent. Why don't they reset IP DSCP at the edge so it is not as obvious that they are doing some kind of traffic shaping? Most CPEs are going to ignore DSCP anyway.

Any insight on how ISPs usually implement this type of QoS? I am thinking at exchange point, source IP (content networks) based mapping. What am I missing here (the linecard is going to be pretty expensive...on platform like ASR9K)?

  • 2
    FYI, providers don't need to mangle your dscp to implement backbone qos, the smartest way for them to mark traffic is using MPLS exp bits – Mike Pennington Nov 9 '14 at 14:30
  • It's just unnecessary processing overhead. Altering a packet while forwarding is an expensive process. – Ricky Beam Nov 9 '14 at 23:29
  • The question was edited to something else... I know nobody (should) trust another network's CoS/DSCP unless it's something explicitly agreed upon. But why don't they reset the DSCP value at the edge to cover their tracks (so end-users in this case can't directly see some of their traffic is being deprioritized) – sdaffa23fdsf Nov 10 '14 at 2:08
  • 1
    If you are concerned about markings in your network, then reset them at your edge interfaces and apply your own. Like @Mike says, the markings you use do not have to be the DSCP information in the original packet. – cpt_fink Nov 10 '14 at 7:12
  • Did any answer help you? If so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you can provide your own answer and accept it. – Ron Maupin Aug 7 '17 at 14:25
6

I have no practical experience in running CoS/DSCP in ISP networks, but a logical explanation would be that it doesn't make sense to just change fields in a header. Even if I as an intermediate ISP wouldn't be interested in these fields, the receiver or some other intermediate party could be. Resetting DSCP fields just because I'm not using them sounds like a waste of resources and unneeded meddling in my customers' packets.

  • 2
    Meddling with packets must be minimal for an ISP because anything changed potentially breaks the customer's requirements – Mike Pennington Nov 9 '14 at 14:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.