edited tags

Link

edited Jan 5, 2019 at 0:38

Bumped by Community user

occurred Jan 28, 2018 at 2:51

Bumped by Community user

occurred Dec 29, 2017 at 2:32

Bumped by Community user

occurred Nov 29, 2017 at 1:34

added 24 characters in body

Source Link

edited Oct 29, 2017 at 23:37

Is it a right way to supernet/range in OSPF for the following network address?

area 0.0.0.x 10.128.0.0 255.255.255.0

area 0.0.0.x 10.128.0.0 255.255.255.0

how 10.128.0.0How 10.128.0.0 can have a subnet of 255.255.255255.255.255.0, e.0 ig.e 24 /24? Is

Is this a right thing to do? I

I thought the right subnet should be 255.255.0255.255.0.0, e.0 ig.e 16 /16?

Am I correct on this?

Is it a right way to supernet/range in OSPF for the following network address?

area 0.0.0.x 10.128.0.0 255.255.255.0

how 10.128.0.0 can have a subnet of 255.255.255.0 i.e 24? Is this a right thing to do? I thought the right subnet should be 255.255.0.0 i.e 16?

Am I correct on this?

Is it a right way to supernet/range in OSPF for the following network address?

area 0.0.0.x 10.128.0.0 255.255.255.0

How 10.128.0.0 can have a subnet of 255.255.255.0, e.g. /24?

Is this a right thing to do?

I thought the right subnet should be 255.255.0.0, e.g. /16?

Am I correct on this?

Source Link

asked Oct 29, 2017 at 23:16

Is this a valid supernetting range for OSPF range command?

Is it a right way to supernet/range in OSPF for the following network address?

area 0.0.0.x 10.128.0.0 255.255.255.0

how 10.128.0.0 can have a subnet of 255.255.255.0 i.e 24? Is this a right thing to do? I thought the right subnet should be 255.255.0.0 i.e 16?

Am I correct on this?

subnet ospf network

Return to Question