1

How to find the total number of subnets available for one subnet mask?.

For example, take this subnet mask:

255.255.255.224 and IP address as 192.168.5.139, book shows that there are 6 subnet for the given subnet mask, ranging from 192.168.5.32 to 192.168.5.192 , how 6 ?

I tried to solve it like this 2^3 = 8 and 8-2 = 6 But I thought that we should subtract 2 only when we find number of hosts (because of network ID and Broadcast).

Why do we subtract 2 for subnets?

  • That stems from the time when there were plenty of IPv4 addresses, and we used network classes, which were killed in 1993 by RFCs 1518 and 1519. The Internet went commercial in 1995, and we saw the writing on the wall, It no longer made sense to waste two subnets for every network. – Ron Maupin Mar 27 '17 at 14:27
  • Did any answer help you? If so, you should accept the answer so that the question doesn't keep popping up forever, looking for an answer. Alternatively, you could provide and accept your own answer. – Ron Maupin Aug 17 '17 at 5:26
3

If a network address is subnetted, the first subnet obtained after subnetting the network address is called subnet zero and the last subnet obtained is called the all-ones subnet.

In your example:

Network: 192.168.5.0

Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224

Subnets:

Subnet            Broadcast
192.168.5.0      192.168.0.31   <-- subnet zero

192.168.5.32     192.168.0.63

192.168.5.64     192.168.0.95

192.168.5.96     192.168.0.127

192.168.5.128    192.168.0.159

192.168.5.160    192.168.0.191

192.168.5.192    192.168.0.223

192.168.5.224    192.168.0.255    <-- all ones

Traditionally, it was strongly recommended that subnet zero and the all-ones subnet not be used for addressing.

According to RFC 950 from 1985:

"It is useful to preserve and extend the interpretation of these special (network and broadcast) addresses in subnetted networks. This means the values of all zeros and all ones in the subnet field should not be assigned to actual (physical) subnets."

Remember that this is a 1985 recommendation. More than 30 years have passed from then.

Using subnet zero for addressing is discouraged because of the confusion inherent in having a network (192.168.5.0) and a subnet (192.169.5.0) with indistinguishable addresses, and the all-ones subnet for the confusion inherent in having a network and a subnet with identical broadcast addresses (192.168.5.255).

This recommendation was overruled in 1995 by RFC-1878 and RFC-1812. So, nowadays we can use all the subnets and the devices' hardware /software support it.

  • You are confusing subnet and address. The first address of a subnet is the "all zero" address (the network address) and the last address is the all one (broadcast) address. Nothing prevent using the first and last subnet – JFL Mar 27 '17 at 8:45
  • read this explanation: routerfreak.com/subnet-zero-and-all-ones-subnet – jcbermu Mar 27 '17 at 8:54
  • 2
    I admit it may relevant to the question, but this date from classful addressing era and is totally deprecated now. This is not relevant to modern networking. Also the question is obviously educational / home working and as such off-topic. – JFL Mar 27 '17 at 9:19
  • I added an explanation of how it is a dated recommendation. – jcbermu Mar 27 '17 at 9:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.