I am seeing following error on 100G interface. (SFP bought from fs.com)
nxos version 9.3.10
2023 Oct 11 00:41:12 spine-1 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_LINK_FAILURE: Interface Ethernet1/4 is down (Link failure)
2023 Oct 11 00:41:26 spine-1 %ETHPORT-5-SPEED: Interface Ethernet1/4, operational speed changed to 100 Gbps
2023 Oct 11 00:41:26 spine-1 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DUPLEX: Interface Ethernet1/4, operational duplex mode changed to Fu
ll
2023 Oct 11 00:41:26 spine-1 %ETHPORT-5-IF_RX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Ethernet1/4, operational Receive Flow Con
trol state changed to off
2023 Oct 11 00:41:26 spine-1 %ETHPORT-5-IF_TX_FLOW_CONTROL: Interface Ethernet1/4, operational Transmit Flow Co
ntrol state changed to off
Interface transceiver info. I have noticed its saying OM3 fiber cable but on actual cable printed OM4. I have just 10 meter distance between two switches.
# show int e1/4 transceiver
Ethernet1/4
transceiver is present
type is QSFP-100G-SR4
name is FS
part number is QSFP28-SR4-100G
revision is 04
serial number is F2140395576
nominal bitrate is 25500 MBit/sec
Link length supported for 50/125um OM3 fiber is 70 m
cisco id is 17
cisco extended id number is 220
Here is the event history of interface. I have changed fiber cable also. I am using MTP/MPO cable
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782144 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
[E_MTS_TX] Dst:MTS_SAP_IPQOS_MGR(377), Opc:MTS_OPC_ETHPM_PORT_BRINGUP(61442)
RRtoken:0x03268C13
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_RSP length:38, at 782560 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
[E_MTS_RX] Src:MTS_SAP_IPQOS_MGR(377), Opc:MTS_OPC_ETHPM_PORT_BRINGUP(61442)
RRtoken:0x03268C13
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782566 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
[E_MTS_TX] Dst:MTS_SAP_PORT_CLIENT(181), Opc:MTS_OPC_LC_PORT_CLIENT_CONFIG(8186)
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782592 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
[E_MTS_TX] Dst:MTS_SAP_VIM(403), Opc:MTS_OPC_ETHPM_PORT_BRINGUP(61442)
ethpm]
FSM:<Ethernet1/4> Transition at 782643 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Previous state: [ETH_PORT_FSM_ST_WAIT_BRINGUP]
Triggered event: [ETH_PORT_FSM_EV_BRINGUP_DONE]
Next state: [ETH_PORT_FSM_ST_WAIT_PRE_LOGICAL_UP]
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_START length:38, at 782681 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
Seq Type:SERIAL
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782733 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
Seq:determine steps to skip
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782762 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
[E_MTS_TX] Dst:MTS_SAP_FLEXLINK(498), Opc:MTS_OPC_ETHPM_PORT_CTRL_UP(61484)
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782774 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
Seq:Sending state up notif to shared vdc
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782777 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
[E_MTS_TX] Dst:MTS_SAP_PIXM_LOCAL(153), Opc:MTS_OPC_PIXM_ALLOC_LTL(69635)
ethpm]
Event:ESQ_REQ length:38, at 782778 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Instance:0x1A000600, Seq Id:0x1, Ret:SUCCESS
[E_MTS_TX] Dst:MTS_SAP_MCECM(450), Opc:MTS_OPC_ETHPM_MCECM_ORPHAN_SUSPEND(61516)
ethpm]
FSM:<Ethernet1/4> Transition at 782811 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Previous state: [ETH_PORT_FSM_ST_WAIT_PRE_LOGICAL_UP]
Triggered event: [ETH_PORT_FSM_EV_PRE_LOGICAL_DONE]
Next state: [ETH_PORT_FSM_ST_WAIT_LOGICAL_UP]
ethpm]
FSM:<Ethernet1/4> Transition at 782817 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Previous state: [ETH_PORT_FSM_ST_WAIT_LOGICAL_UP]
Triggered event: [ETH_PORT_FSM_EV_L3_UP]
Next state: [ETH_PORT_FSM_ST_L3_UP]
ethpm]
FSM:<Ethernet1/4> Transition at 787693 usecs after Wed Oct 11 00:41:26 2023
Previous state: [ETH_PORT_FSM_ST_L3_UP]
Triggered event: [ETH_PORT_FSM_EV_SI_DONE]
Next state: [FSM_ST_NO_CHANGE]
Interface denounce timer is following. Does denounce timer matter because, it came up in google search and some people adjusting it for bigger number.
# show interface debounce
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port Debounce time Value(ms) Debounce(link-up) Value(ms)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eth1/1 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/2 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/3 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/4 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/5 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/6 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/7 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/8 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/9 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/10 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/11 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/12 enable 100 disable 0
Eth1/13 enable 100 disable 0
Made in Vietnam
and some has labelMade in China
Vietnam cable casing me me issue. Interface coming up and going down random. When I plug china cable it come up and never go down. I have check description of both cable and they are all same. Type: B etc.. I am going to ask FS.COM about wth is going on here. Did you notice this issue?