Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 37080

For questions about Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4); as specified in RFC791.

3 votes
1 answer
916 views

NAT64 return translation doesn't work

-> IPv6): 0 Packets translated (IPv6 -> IPv4): 0 Number of packets translated by stateful NAT64: Packets translated (IPv4 -> IPv6): 0 Packets translated (IPv6 -> IPv4): 75 Global … Statistics Prefix: 64:FF9B::/96 Packets translated (IPv4 -> IPv6): 0 Packets translated (IPv6 -> IPv4): 20 Packets dropped: 0 Wireshark capture on ipv4 network: on the IPv4
bd123456's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

NAT64 return translation doesn't work

okey I found the solution: the v4 pool can't be in the same subnet as the interface is. with an IP in another subnet everything works fine
bd123456's user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
211 views

IS-IS IPv6 over IPv4

So would it be possible to connect two IPv6 areas over an IPv4 area? A router in area A knows that the destination ipv6 address is at the router in area B. So the route would be set, isn't it? … But what would be the destination of this packet when it is on the IPv4 area? best regards …
bd123456's user avatar