Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4); as specified in RFC791.
3
votes
1
answer
916
views
NAT64 return translation doesn't work
-> IPv6): 0
Packets translated (IPv6 -> IPv4): 0
Number of packets translated by stateful NAT64:
Packets translated (IPv4 -> IPv6): 0
Packets translated (IPv6 -> IPv4): 75
Global … Statistics
Prefix: 64:FF9B::/96
Packets translated (IPv4 -> IPv6): 0
Packets translated (IPv6 -> IPv4): 20
Packets dropped: 0
Wireshark capture on ipv4 network:
on the IPv4 …
2
votes
Accepted
NAT64 return translation doesn't work
okey I found the solution:
the v4 pool can't be in the same subnet as the interface is.
with an IP in another subnet everything works fine
1
vote
4
answers
211
views
IS-IS IPv6 over IPv4
So would it be possible to connect two IPv6 areas over an IPv4 area?
A router in area A knows that the destination ipv6 address is at the router in area B. So the route would be set, isn't it? … But what would be the destination of this packet when it is on the IPv4 area?
best regards …